Tuesday, November 06, 2007

Unnecscary Attacks On Hillary: Edwards and Obama Get desperate.

There at it again, a little earlier then usaul, but it comes as sure as the sun will rise. Attacks on other canadates. This time the laggers and losers in the polls are attacking the dominant Hillary, trying to distract America, they turn torwards Hillary and like a little school boy stubborn and won quit. Here are some article pulled from various sources. Edwards Steps Up Attack on Clinton in Iowa Over Iran, Lobbyists - Bloomberg.com, Obama hits Clinton on a sacred topic: ethanol - google news, Newsweek's Obama interview: Challenging Clinton - patriot news Hit Her Again! Time and a qoute from a time article Obama attack Clinton (a challenge cleverly disguised as a question). So why is Clinton being attacked by the laggers; simply because there scared and they know she will win. So they figure Hey why not take her down with me? This has got to stop Instead of distracting voters why not talk to them.

Wednesday, May 23, 2007

1 Laptop per child , why not per person?




The one laptop per person is a great idea. Giving disadvanted kids third world countries ,the ability to read, educate, entertain, and find jobs and oppertunities. However I do not see why the program is available to everyone? For example in the poor parts of a city a kid with a laptop would be able to find educational oppertunities, finacial aid and conduct valid research. So why not make it available to everyone? Also the 300 dollar price (1 laptop for you and 2 for others) is a little outragious, I mean I believe $150 would suffice, but 300 is just out of a lot of people who want to help.

Tuesday, May 22, 2007

So Iraq? Whats new?



Iraq, Iraq, Iraq. It seems today that is all you here on the media today Iraq. But frankly what is there to report? Taht we are losing? The only news reports coming out of Iraq these days, are car bombings and troop deaths. So why do we keep reporting same ol' same ol'? It does not make any sense. Does the Media believe that it needs to report everything going on in Iraq, well apparently it does. But why obviously the public feels the war has dragged on for to long, but none the less we turn on our TV and see the carnage we saw yesterday, were is the change?

Hillary Or Clinton


Why is it that we call Hillary Clinton by her first name of Hillary instead of like everyother presidentail hopeful, by there last. Maybes its because she is a women, and men tend to condescend when talking about feamle canadites, but I believe differently. I believe it is because it is what she wants. Admit it if she was reffered to as CLinton, imagine how confused people would become. It is like two diiferent brandnames sharing the same name. Such as Abercrombie sharing the same name as gap. Also Hillary do not want the voters to attribute the bad qualities of Bill to Hillary. I mean check her website, it does not say CLinton 08 but Hillary 08. She wants to imprint the idea tat she is not her husband, but her running for president and just her

Democrats web 2.0






The Washington Post has a good point. The republicans trail badly in terms of websites and technology. Graphic chart - http://media3.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2007/05/21/GR2007052100039.jpg


Hillary has here Hillcast, Obarma has the most views, and Edwards the most hits this month and the republican canadates? The democrats lead in everything youtube, website hits, and online donations.


Hillary on Youtube has 3191 subscribers and 592 404 channel views while Guiliani has only 1390 subscribers and 83 147 channel views. Same with website hits Barrack Obama has 7.6 million views while the republican leader Guliani has only 1.1 million views. Same with online donations, Obama, Clinton, and Edwards amassed 16 million dollars online while the republicans managed 6 million. - Source Washington Post

Monday, May 21, 2007

Wolfwitz Why if he goes it doesn't matter




Even if wolfwitz goes there will be another wolfwitz to replace him. That is so because President Bush, the same person who chose wolfwitz will now choose another unworthy leader. America has an unfair influence of power in the world bank, even though other countries are represnted it is tradition that the American president chooses the next president. The tradition was started in 1944 in Bretton Woods New Hampshire. Even though the United states has 16 percent of the votes it still dominates every part of the Bank. It is time for change, we need a democracy when it comes to electing World Bank leaders, not a dictorailship with no real power.